Healthcare

Medicare vs Medicare 4 All

I have a few simple questions.

If Medicare is the model we are to follow for all Americans and Medicare is the model for administrative efficiency and Medicare pays health care providers far less than private insurers, why is all the following true?

Why are costs still increasing at rates beyond normal inflation? Why has funding been allowed to remain inadequate and at the same time spending to contribute to the deficit without limit?

If Medicare can’t be managed for a minority group of Americans, how will it be managed for all Americans? What will be different?

🤑😷🤑😷🤑😷🤑😷🤑😷🤑😷🤑😷🤑😷🤑😷🤑😷😷🤑😷🤑😷🤑😷🤑

Financial Status 2018 Trustee Report

Total Medicare expenditures were $710 billion in 2017. The Board projects that expenditures will increase in future years at a faster pace than either aggregate workers’ earnings or the economy overall and that, as a percentage of GDP, they will increase from 3.7 percent in 2017 to 6.2 percent by 2092 (based on the Trustees’ intermediate set of assumptions).

If the relatively low price increases for physicians and other health services under Medicare are not sustained and do not take full effect in the long range as in the illustrative alternative projection, then Medicare spending would instead represent roughly 8.9 percent of GDP in 2092. Growth under any of these scenarios, if realized, would substantially increase the strain on the nation’s workers, the economy, Medicare beneficiaries, and the Federal budget.

The Trustees project that HI tax income and other dedicated revenues will fall short of HI expenditures in all future years. The HI trust fund does not meet either the Trustees’ test of short-range financial adequacy or their test of long-range close actuarial balance.

The Part B and Part D accounts in the SMI trust fund are expected to be adequately financed because premium income and general revenue income are reset each year to cover expected costs. Such financing, however, would have to increase faster than the economy to cover expected expenditure growth.

The financial projections in this report indicate a need for substantial steps to address Medicare’s remaining financial challenges.

Consideration of further reforms should occur in the near future. The sooner solutions are enacted, the more flexible and gradual they can be. Moreover, the early introduction of reforms increases the time available for affected individuals and organizations—including health care providers, beneficiaries, and taxpayers—to adjust their expectations and behavior. The Trustees recommend that Congress and the executive branch work closely together with a sense of urgency to address the depletion of the HI trust fund and the projected growth in HI (Part A) and SMI (Parts B and D) expenditures.

Funding

For HI, the primary source of financing is the payroll tax on covered earnings. Employers and employees each pay 1.45 percent of a worker’s wages, while self-employed workers pay 2.9 percent of their net earnings. Starting in 2013, high-income workers pay an additional 0.9-percent tax on their earnings above an unindexed threshold ($200,000 for single taxpayers and $250,000 for married couples).

Other HI revenue sources include a portion of the Federal income taxes that Social Security recipients with incomes above certain unindexed thresholds pay on their benefits, as well as interest paid from the general fund on the U.S. Treasury securities held in the HI trust fund.

For SMI, transfers from the general fund of the Treasury represent the largest source of income and covered about 70 percent of program costs in 2017. Also, beneficiaries pay monthly premiums for Parts B and D that finance a portion of the total cost. As with HI, the U.S. Treasury securities held in the SMI trust fund earn interest paid from the general fund.

Advertisements

2 replies »

  1. Healthcare such as M4A is being push as a basic right. Then how under Obamacare could you chosen not to have healthcare? If healthcare had been a right granted by the government then how could they fine you or just not provide it to you. Healthcare is something that you had to buy into even under Obamacare. Therefore it was not and is not a right. Even though Medicare is now an entitlement, it is not a right but an entitlement that is earned by working and paying into the Medicare fund. (Underfunding Medicare is a different issue). Do you have to pay for any other of your rights?

    Another reality is that life is terminal. No amount of money will get you eternal life. Somethings just can’t be cured. You can’t always be saved from heart attacks or accidents.

    If healthcare was a right then everybody would be able to demand the best treatment or be forced into treatment no matter the cost. You want the latest drug, it’s your right. You want a lung transplant, you got it. The government must cure my cancer, it’s my right. Will the government force doctors at gunpoint to be the very best in their field and only get paid what the governments says?

    No government in the world would be able to pay for all and every treatment you demand. Therefore healthcare must be rationed. No government in the world could spend enough money on R&D to cure every disease and cancer. They cannot give eternal life. A government that declares healthcare a right is a foolish government. Life should be left in the hands of the God of your choosing, and the government should not play God.

    If a government is responsible for your healthcare, then they should also be able to punish you for at risk behavior (smoking, eating, sports, or working 16 hours a day).

    A government must be able to get the most positive outcomes for their limited resources. The people who think that M4A is a cure all must understand that rationing and limiting procedures and treatments will happen. There is no way around that fact. The people must also pay since it is the people who fund the government. M4A is a policy plan that one hospital bed fits all, which will never work.

    Like

  2. As has been pointed out in this blog, the cost of health insurance is driven primarily, even overwhelmingly, by the cost of health care, not insurance company profits or salaries.

    Health procedures which were exotic and rare, are now commonplace. Joint replacement, cataract surgery, open heart surgery, kidney dialysis, etc.

    Pharmaceutical products continue to amaze and multiply.

    Total healthcare spending will continue to increase as the size and average age of the population increases.

    I do not think a government controlled health system along the lines of the United Kingdom is either wise or affordable. The rationing of health care common in the UK will not be tolerated here, at least not now. I do reluctantly admit that this may change in the future if socialism overcomes capitalism.

    Like

What's your opinion on this post? Readers would like your point of view.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s