Healthcare

3 reasons health insurers are losing money on the ACA exchanges | FierceHealthcare

Or, to put it another way, why are premiums rising? Because they were set too low to cover the cost of claims incurred by those individuals who enrolled. Bazinga‼️🤑

img_2173-1Administration officials with CMS like to repeat the myth the ACA has put in place changes that control health care costs. That is very misleading. There are several changes related to Medicare reimbursement that are designed to lower its costs, but as far as the general population goes Obamacare raises both claim and administrative costs for insurers, employers and health care providers. The non-profit co-ops are mostly defunct leaving millions in unpaid loans for taxpayers to absorb

Fewer than 25 percent of insurers across the country kept the ratio of medical claims to premiums at or below a profitable threshold for their Affordable Care Act exchange policies, according to an analysis of nearly 100 healthcare plans by Politico, raising concerns that insurers will continue to sustain losses without significant policy changes.

In North Carolina, Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina lost more than $400 million on its ACA policies in 2014 and 2015. Although the uninsured rate has dropped 30 percent in the state, last year BCBSNC and Aetna saw medical costs rise above 100 percent of premiums, far surpassing the 85 percent mark required for carriers to break even, according to the news outlet. In other states, like Colorado and Oregon, insurers paid out 20 percent more in medical costs than they took in for premiums.

Politico attributes the financial struggles to three issues:

Fewer enrollees than originally predicted: The Congressional Budget Office has lowered its ACA exchange plan enrollment estimate from 21 million per month to 13 million, in part because employers did not dump their health plans as expected, and because fewer “young invincibles” signed up for coverage.

An imbalanced risk pool: Although fewer young individuals enrolled, sicker individuals who were previously excluded from purchasing did, thanks to a cornerstone provision that prohibited insurers from denying policies to individuals with preexisting conditions. That, coupled with fewer employers dropping health plans, threw off the risk pool and left insurers that underestimated medical costs carrying the burden.

Risk corridor payment problems: The ACA included provisions designed to protect insurers from paying the price for enrolling sicker individuals, commonly referred to as the “three R’s.” Of those, the risk corridor program ran into trouble after a Republican-led Congress limited its funding. Ultimately, the government paid just about 12 percent of what it owed to insurers, leading to lawsuits from three separate carriers.

Source: 3 reasons health insurers are losing money on the ACA exchanges | FierceHealthcare

Advertisements

2 replies »

What's your opinion on this post? Readers would like your point of view.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s