President Obama’s Hypocrisy on Syria – The New York Times

I did not write any of the following, but I sure agree with it. This president is a political animal and nothing more. His leadership, decision-making and negotiating skills are non-existent which is perhaps why he was an academic and never held a real job.  He excels at little more than dividing our nation in the hope of furthering his naive ideology. 

The refugee crisis illuminates the failure of his approach to politics.
Source: President Obama’s Hypocrisy on Syria – The New York Times

The president flippantly dismissed worries about the vetting process despite the fact that, as James R. Clapper Jr., the director of national intelligence, said in September, the possibility that the Islamic State might infiltrate operatives among Syrian refugees is “a huge concern of ours.”

Administration officials also acknowledge that there are limitations on determining the history of Syrian refugees since we’re in no position to collect vital information from Syria. Even if the president believes the case for accepting refugees overrides those concerns (as I basically do), he should acknowledge their legitimacy.

What made Mr. Obama’s assault on Republicans particularly outrageous is his hypocrisy, by which I mean the president’s failure to act in any meaningful way to avert the humanitarian disaster now engulfing Syria. It’s not as if options weren’t available to him.

In 2012 Mr. Obama rebuffed plans to arm Syrian rebels despite the fact that his former secretaries of defense and state, his C.I.A. director and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff supported them. He repeatedly insisted he would not put American soldiers in Syria or pursue a prolonged air campaign. He refused to declare safe havens or no-fly zones. And it was also in 2012 that Mr. Obama warned the Syrian president, Bashar al-Assad, that using chemical weapons would cross a “red line.” Yet when Mr. Assad did just that, Mr. Obama did nothing.

The president, perhaps fearful of offending the pro-Assad Iranian government with which he was trying to negotiate a nuclear arms deal, chose to sit by while a humanitarian catastrophe unfolded. As Walter Russell Mead wrote in The American Interest, “This crisis is in large part the direct consequence of President Obama’s decision to stand aside and watch Syria burn.” Some of us find it a bit nervy for the president to lecture the opposition party for heartlessness because cleaning up after his failure raises security concerns.


Categories: Politics

Tagged as: , , , ,

2 replies »

  1. So Typical of Reich-Wing warmed-over Bull Shit – Congressonal Republicans refuse to vote to support our president in the Middle East and they refuse to vote to oppose our president in the Middle East – their 7-year obstructionist strategy of a black president will never end – their strategy is to do nothing regarding the Middle East – if our president is successful, they will say that he should have done it sooner – if our president does not immediately prevail, they will critcize and condemn his actions – a classic failure to do their jobs – they are traitors and racists embarrassing us in the eyes of the world by not being a part of a united nation-this rehetoric is deplorable and sickening – internal poltics should cease at our shoreline!!


    • You just can’t accept anything that doesn’t fit your view of the world. Do you disputed any of the information the NYT writer provides? This rhetoric is deplorable, but left wing rhetoric that is misleading and pandering for votes is ok?


What's your opinion on this post? Readers would like your point of view.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s