Surge In Statin Use Among Very Elderly Without Heart Trouble Raises Doubts | Kaiser Health News

Many doctors are choosing a better-safe-than-sorry approach to heading off heart trouble in very elderly patients.  Inexpensive statin drugs are given to millions of people to reduce cholesterol, even many who do not show signs of heart disease.

But a recent study has found that seniors with no history of heart trouble are now four times more likely to get those drugs than they were in 1999.  Here’s the catch: For patients of that age, there is little research showing statins’ preventive heart benefits outweigh possible risks, which can include muscle pain and the onset of diabetes.

There have only been a handful of studies that included the over-79 population, according to a review in the American Journal of Cardiology in 2012.  With the average life expectancy at 76 for men and 81 for women in the U.S., drug companies haven’t funded such studies in people above 79. There have been many studies involving younger people.  Statins have been shown to reduce the risks of a heart attack or stroke in patients who have had one and possibly prevent an episode in people with high cholesterol who haven’t.

doctor_thoughtful_lg_whtThe drugs, which include the well-known brands Lipitor and Crestor as well as generics, have been on the market for almost 30 years.  Arta Bakshandeh, a senior medical officer with Alignment Healthcare, a company that advises Medicare insurance plans, sums up the dilemma for health plans and doctors with elderly patients.  “With health reform there is a push to have primary prevention … if you can prevent [beneficiaries] from having a heart attack that will cost way more than the $30,000 for a statin over the lifetime, we should focus on primary prevention,” he said.

This KHN story also ran in USA Today.

“But if we’re overprescribing and not taking into account all the drugs patients are on, that is going to land people in the hospital as well. It’s a fine balance.”The rate of statin use among octogenarians and beyond who don’t have a history of heart attack, stroke, coronary heart disease or vascular heart disease increased four times from 1999 through 2012, according to two researchers from Ohio State University and the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada. Their research letter was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association Internal Medicine in August.

Despite the lack of evidence to guide the use of statins in this population, “the very elderly have the highest rate of statin use in the United States,” they said, citing past studies.  Concerns about statins’ effects in those older than 79 are being raised as some cardiologists question whether statins are overprescribed even among some younger people.

Guidelines published by the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology in 2013 recommended statins as a preventive measure for people with high cholesterol but no overt heart disease if their 10-year risk of suffering a heart attack or stroke is 7.5% or higher.

Source: Surge In Statin Use Among Very Elderly Without Heart Trouble Raises Doubts | Kaiser Health News


4 replies »

  1. The drug companies have cherry picked the good results out of these studies and only report that. It is 1 out of 100 where a heart attack is prevented. What they leave out is that 5 out of 100 who did not actually need the statin do have a heart attack after beginning the statin. The big unknown here is if any of those 5 would have had a heart attack had they not taken the statin. But 5 new heart attacks vs 1 prevented heart attack doesn’t help the marketing machine.


  2. Doctors are lazy and do not want to tell the patients that they need to adjust their diet and lose weight. Three different times my wife’s doctor wanted her to take medications that would interact with drugs she was already taking. He also, wanted her to take a Statin drug to lower her cholesterol, even though her ratio between good and bad is 2.8 to 1. You should only worry if the ratio is 3.5 to 1 or higher. She has been able to lower it 34 points with changes in diet losing 25 lbs. I always check drugs out on the internet and weigh the benefits with the risks and believe most benefits do not out weigh the risks.


      • I had to go to the doctor in July because of edema in my legs and feet. He put me on a low dose diuretic 25 mg. My weight was 285, he told me I was headed for some real big problems if I did not lose weight. Doctors in the past had always told me to cut out the fat, no butter, no whole milk. All my lab work came back normal as did my EKG and Echo. He told me to go on a low carb diet and get my weight down. In three months I have lost 28 lbs. Most people eat 250 to 300 grams of carbs per day. My wife and I are eating under 100 grams per day. Almost everyone has it wrong, fat is not making us fat it is sugar. When you have to much sugar in the diet the body releases insulin the fat storage hormone. When the food companies took the fat out of foods 40 years ago they replaced it with sugar. It is no wonder everyone is getting fatter and there is a rise in diabetes. My sister found the book Protein Power by Michael R Eades and Mary Dan Eades written in 1995. It is a life saver and I will be following it the rest of my life.


What's your opinion on this post? Readers would like your point of view.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s