Archive | 7:14 AM

A deal is a deal…or so we thought

28 Aug

 

The trend continues, the defined benefit pension is dying a slow death and with its passing will come a changed society, a changed workforce and millions more Americans left on their own to fund and manage their retirement income.  Watson Wyatt reports that even among Fortune 1000 companies, the number sponsoring a defined benefit plan has dropped from 59% to 42% between 2004 and 2009 and more have eliminated them for new hires. 

You can imagine the reasons for all this, but it all comes down to one thing, earnings for the next quarter are more important than the employees who may have counted on these programs for the last several decades.  Just as pensions are funded over many decades so there should be a long-term commitment to workers, in some cases even before a commitment to shareholders who know or should know about these obligations before they invest.  One may make the case that when there is a true survival situation it is better to keep a Company going and freeze a pension plan and I can buy that, but otherwise, a deal is a deal in my view. 

If I'm late for the staff meeting one more time, I've had it.

I frequently sound the call of unintended consequences and this is a good example.  A myriad of laws and regulations related to funding, reporting, disclosure etc. intended in large part to protect plan participants, have in reality contributed significantly to the demise of the pension.  The same holds true for retiree medical, accounting rules designed for transparency, killed this coverage and while the majority of Americans never had this benefit, its elimination will have a profound impact on future generations and on the future workforce. 

Better prepare for a “normal” retirement age of 80.  Are the halls wide enough for those mobile chairs?

OMG I was wrong-sort of

28 Aug

 

In my post regarding living on a fixed income I predicted that the AARP would be up in arms because there is no COLA for Social Security benefits in 2010, inflation or the lack thereof does not justify it and given that in 2009 the increase was 5.8% us seasoned citizens still have a pretty good deal.  Indeed the AARP does have it’s undies in a bunch and on top of that the WSJ reports that members of Congress want the COLA calculation reviewed, is there no shame? 

Ah, dodged another bullet

Ah, dodged another bullet

At a time when workers are being laid off, seeing pay cut or stay the same while trying to support their families, this so-called representative of older Americans wants more for the people in this country who already receive a disproportionate portion of our wealth  (and yes, at 66 and 70 my wife and I are among them- I’m the young one by the way).

Now here is where I was wrong, without checking my facts and naively believing there was some logic in all this I stated that the Medicare Part B premium would be rising in 2010 because of health care inflation and the fact that the premium is supposed to represent 25% of the cost.   Silly me.

In fact, there is a provision in the law that prevents an increase in the Part B premium in any year there is no increase in  Social Security benefits. There you go, more efficient cost management of health care by our Congress. 

The Medicare trust fund is in trouble starting when?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 345 other followers